On 04.02.20 22:16, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 03/02/2020 14.19, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Since KVM doesn't emulate any form of load control and load psw >> instructions anymore, we wouldn't get an interception if PSWs or CRs >> are changed in the guest. That means we can't inject IRQs right after >> the guest is enabled for them. > > I had to read that twice to understand it. I'd suggest maybe rather > something like: > > Since there is no interception for load control and load psw instruction > in the protected mode, we need a new way to get notified whether we have > to inject an IRQ right after the guest has just enabled the possibility > for receiving them. I will use this with minor tweaks. > >> The new interception codes solve that problem by being a notification > > maybe s/being/providing/ ack
