On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 10:38:55 +0100 Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04.02.20 10:28, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 23:03:42 +0100 > > Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> On 03.02.20 18:12, Cornelia Huck wrote: > >>> On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 08:19:22 -0500 > >>> Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>>> From: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> > >>>> Introduce KVM_S390_PROTECTED_VIRTUALIZATION_HOST kbuild option for > >>>> protected virtual machines hosting support code. > >>> > >>> Hm... I seem to remember that you wanted to drop this config option and > >>> always build the code, in order to reduce complexity. Have you > >>> reconsidered this? > >> > >> I am still in favour of removing this, but I did not get an "yes, lets do > >> it" answer. Since removing is easier than re-adding its still in. > > > > ok > > Any preference from you? Not at the moment, I still need to look at the following patches. > > [...] > > > > I think I was confused about different things last time... > > > > But that is probably a sign that this wants a comment :) > > Will add > > to kernel/uv.c > /* the bootdata_preserved fields come from ones in arch/s390/boot/uv.c */ > > to boot/uv.c > /* will be used in arch/s390/kernel/uv.c */ Thanks! > > > [...] > > Fair enough; it's just that it's not very clear from the messages in > > the log what happened. Maybe > > > > "prot_virt: Running as protected virtualization guest." > > "prot_virt: The ultravisor call facility is not available." > > > > That at least links back to the kernel parameter. > > I will defer this until the end, in the hope to have a final name by then. > ok
