On 04.02.20 10:28, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 23:03:42 +0100 > Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 03.02.20 18:12, Cornelia Huck wrote: >>> On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 08:19:22 -0500 >>> Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> From: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> Introduce KVM_S390_PROTECTED_VIRTUALIZATION_HOST kbuild option for >>>> protected virtual machines hosting support code. >>> >>> Hm... I seem to remember that you wanted to drop this config option and >>> always build the code, in order to reduce complexity. Have you >>> reconsidered this? >> >> I am still in favour of removing this, but I did not get an "yes, lets do >> it" answer. Since removing is easier than re-adding its still in. > > ok Any preference from you? [...] > > I think I was confused about different things last time... > > But that is probably a sign that this wants a comment :) Will add to kernel/uv.c /* the bootdata_preserved fields come from ones in arch/s390/boot/uv.c */ to boot/uv.c /* will be used in arch/s390/kernel/uv.c */ [...] > Fair enough; it's just that it's not very clear from the messages in > the log what happened. Maybe > > "prot_virt: Running as protected virtualization guest." > "prot_virt: The ultravisor call facility is not available." > > That at least links back to the kernel parameter. I will defer this until the end, in the hope to have a final name by then.
