On 17/12/19 17:42, Peter Xu wrote: > > However I just noticed something... Note that we still didn't read > into non-x86 archs, I think it's the same question as when I asked > whether we can unify the kvm[_vcpu]_write() interfaces and you'd like > me to read the non-x86 archs - I think it's time I read them, because > it's still possible that non-x86 archs will still need the per-vm > ring... then that could be another problem if we want to at last > spread the dirty ring idea outside of x86. We can take a look, but I think based on x86 experience it's okay if we restrict dirty ring to arches that do no VM-wide accesses. Paolo
