On 17/12/19 16:38, Peter Xu wrote: > There's still time to persuade me to going back to it. :) > > (Though, yes I still like current solution... if we can get rid of the > only kvmgt ugliness, we can even throw away the per-vm ring with its > "extra" 4k page. Then I suppose it'll be even harder to persuade me :) Actually that's what convinced me in the first place, so let's absolutely get rid of both the per-VM ring and the union. Kevin and Alex have answered and everybody seems to agree. Paolo
