On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 15:11, gengdongjiu <gengdongjiu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2019/10/28 22:56, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 09:50:21PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote: > >> Hi Michael, > >> > >> On 2019/10/28 16:28, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>>>> gets some testing. I'll leave this decision to the ARM maintainer. For > >>>>> ACPI parts: > >>>>> > >>>>> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> Got it, Thanks for the Reviewed-by from Michael. > >>>> > >>>> Hi Michael, > >>>> According to discussion with QEMU community, I finished and developed the whole ARM RAS virtualization solution, and introduce the ARM APEI table in the first time. > >>>> For the newly created files, which are mainly about ARM APEI/GHES part,I would like to maintain them. If you agree it, whether I can add new maintainers[1]? thanks a lot. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> [1]: > >>>> +ARM APEI Subsystem > >>>> +M: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> +M: Xiang zheng <zhengxiang9@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> +L: qemu-arm@xxxxxxxxxx > >>>> +S: Maintained > >>>> +F: hw/acpi/acpi_ghes.c > >>>> > >>> I think for now you want to be a designated reviewer. So I'd use an R: > >>> tag. > >> > >> Thanks for the reply. > >> I want to be a maintainer for my newly created files, so whether I can use M: tag. I would like to contribute some time to maintain that, thanks a lot. > > > > This will fundamentally be up to Peter. > > Thanks. > > Hi Peter, > what do you think about it? I suggest you just use R: for the moment. The code will all end up going through my tree or perhaps Michael's anyway, so it doesn't make much practical difference. thanks -- PMM
