On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 09:50:21PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On 2019/10/28 16:28, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>> gets some testing. I'll leave this decision to the ARM maintainer. For > >>> ACPI parts: > >>> > >>> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Got it, Thanks for the Reviewed-by from Michael. > >> > >> Hi Michael, > >> According to discussion with QEMU community, I finished and developed the whole ARM RAS virtualization solution, and introduce the ARM APEI table in the first time. > >> For the newly created files, which are mainly about ARM APEI/GHES part,I would like to maintain them. If you agree it, whether I can add new maintainers[1]? thanks a lot. > >> > >> > >> [1]: > >> +ARM APEI Subsystem > >> +M: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> +M: Xiang zheng <zhengxiang9@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> +L: qemu-arm@xxxxxxxxxx > >> +S: Maintained > >> +F: hw/acpi/acpi_ghes.c > >> +F: include/hw/acpi/acpi_ghes.h > >> +F: docs/specs/acpi_hest_ghes.rst > >> > > I think for now you want to be a designated reviewer. So I'd use an R: > > tag. > > Thanks for the reply. > I want to be a maintainer for my newly created files, so whether I can use M: tag. I would like to contribute some time to maintain that, thanks a lot. This will fundamentally be up to Peter. Reviewing patches is generally the best way to become a maintainer, that's why I suggested the R: tag. > > > >>> > >>>> ---
