On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 11:08 AM Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Commit 204c91eff798a ("KVM: selftests: do not blindly clobber registers in
> guest asm") was intended to make test more gcc-proof, however, the result
> is exactly the opposite: on newer gccs (e.g. 8.2.1) the test breaks with
>
> ==== Test Assertion Failure ====
> x86_64/sync_regs_test.c:168: run->s.regs.regs.rbx == 0xBAD1DEA + 1
> pid=14170 tid=14170 - Invalid argument
> 1 0x00000000004015b3: main at sync_regs_test.c:166 (discriminator 6)
> 2 0x00007f413fb66412: ?? ??:0
> 3 0x000000000040191d: _start at ??:?
> rbx sync regs value incorrect 0x1.
>
> Apparently, compile is still free to play games with registers even
> when they have variables attaches.
>
> Re-write guest code with 'asm volatile' by embedding ucall there and
> making sure rbx is preserved.
>
> Fixes: 204c91eff798a ("KVM: selftests: do not blindly clobber registers in guest asm")
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c | 21 ++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c
> index 11c2a70a7b87..5c8224256294 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c
> @@ -22,18 +22,19 @@
>
> #define VCPU_ID 5
>
> +#define UCALL_PIO_PORT ((uint16_t)0x1000)
> +
> +/*
> + * ucall is embedded here to protect against compiler reshuffling registers
> + * before calling a function. In this test we only need to get KVM_EXIT_IO
> + * vmexit and preserve RBX, no additional information is needed.
> + */
> void guest_code(void)
> {
> - /*
> - * use a callee-save register, otherwise the compiler
> - * saves it around the call to GUEST_SYNC.
> - */
> - register u32 stage asm("rbx");
> - for (;;) {
> - GUEST_SYNC(0);
> - stage++;
> - asm volatile ("" : : "r" (stage));
> - }
> + asm volatile("1: in %[port], %%al\n"
> + "add $0x1, %%rbx\n"
> + "jmp 1b"
> + : : [port] "d" (UCALL_PIO_PORT) : "rax", "rbx");
> }
A better solution might be something like:
register u32 stage = 0;
for (;;) {
asm volatile("in %[port], %%al"
:
: "b" (stage), [port] "d" (UCALL_PIO_PORT)
: "rax");
stage++;
}
(Gmail no doubt has mangled the indentation. Sorry.)
