On 10/7/2019 8:01 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 30/09/19 09:22, Like Xu wrote:
-static int perf_event_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 __user *arg)
+static int _perf_event_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 value)
__perf_event_period or perf_event_period_locked would be more consistent
with other code in Linux.
But that will be not consistent with current perf code. For example,
_perf_event_enable(), _perf_event_disable(), _perf_event_reset() and
_perf_event_refresh().
Currently, The function name without '_' prefix is the one exported and
with lock. The function name with '_' prefix is the main body.
If we have to use the "_locked" or "__", I think we'd better change the
name for other functions as well.
Thanks,
Kan
