On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 09:35:59AM -0700, Jim Mattson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 12:34 AM Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Liran Alon <liran.alon@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> > > Commit bf653b78f960 ("KVM: vmx: Introduce handle_unexpected_vmexit
> > > and handle WAITPKG vmexit") introduced proprietary handling of
> > > specific exit-reasons that should not be raised by CPU because
> > > KVM configures VMCS such that they should never be raised.
> > >
> > > However, since commit 7396d337cfad ("KVM: x86: Return to userspace
> > > with internal error on unexpected exit reason"), VMX & SVM
> > > exit handlers were modified to generically handle all unexpected
> > > exit-reasons by returning to userspace with internal error.
> > >
> > > Therefore, there is no need for proprietary handling of specific
> > > unexpected exit-reasons (This proprietary handling also introduced
> > > inconsistency for these exit-reasons to silently skip guest instruction
> > > instead of return to userspace on internal-error).
> > >
> > > Fixes: bf653b78f960 ("KVM: vmx: Introduce handle_unexpected_vmexit and handle WAITPKG vmexit")
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Liran Alon <liran.alon@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > (It's been awhile since in software world the word 'proprietary' became
> > an opposite of free/open-source to me so I have to admit your subject
> > line really got me interested :-)
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I agree that proprietary is an unusual word choice.
It's one way to get quick reviews though :-)
