On 12/09/19 18:55, Jim Mattson wrote:
> According to the Intel SDM, volume 2, "CPUID," the index is
> significant (or partially significant) for CPUID leaves 0FH, 10H, 12H,
> 17H, 18H, and 1FH.
>
> Add the corresponding flag to these CPUID leaves in do_host_cpuid().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Shier <pshier@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Steve Rutherford <srutherford@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: a87f2d3a6eadab ("KVM: x86: Add Intel CPUID.1F cpuid emulation support")
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> index 22c2720cd948e..e7d25f4364664 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> @@ -304,7 +304,13 @@ static void do_host_cpuid(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, u32 function,
> case 7:
> case 0xb:
> case 0xd:
> + case 0xf:
> + case 0x10:
> + case 0x12:
> case 0x14:
> + case 0x17:
> + case 0x18:
> + case 0x1f:
> case 0x8000001d:
> entry->flags |= KVM_CPUID_FLAG_SIGNIFCANT_INDEX;
> break;
>
Queued, thanks.
Paolo
