On 19/09/19 01:05, Jim Mattson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:41 AM Krish Sadhukhan
> <krish.sadhukhan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9/12/19 9:55 AM, Jim Mattson wrote:
>>> According to the Intel SDM, volume 2, "CPUID," the index is
>>> significant (or partially significant) for CPUID leaves 0FH, 10H, 12H,
>>> 17H, 18H, and 1FH.
>>>
>>> Add the corresponding flag to these CPUID leaves in do_host_cpuid().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Reviewed-by: Peter Shier <pshier@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Reviewed-by: Steve Rutherford <srutherford@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Fixes: a87f2d3a6eadab ("KVM: x86: Add Intel CPUID.1F cpuid emulation support")
>>> ---
>>> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 6 ++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>>> index 22c2720cd948e..e7d25f4364664 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>>> @@ -304,7 +304,13 @@ static void do_host_cpuid(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, u32 function,
>>> case 7:
>>> case 0xb:
>>> case 0xd:
>>> + case 0xf:
>>> + case 0x10:
>>> + case 0x12:
>>> case 0x14:
>>> + case 0x17:
>>> + case 0x18:
>>> + case 0x1f:
>>> case 0x8000001d:
>>> entry->flags |= KVM_CPUID_FLAG_SIGNIFCANT_INDEX;
>>> break;
>>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> Ping.
>
Queued, thanks.
Paolo
