On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 3:25 AM Liran Alon <liran.alon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Commit cd7764fe9f73 ("KVM: x86: latch INITs while in system management mode")
> changed code to latch INIT while vCPU is in SMM and process latched INIT
> when leaving SMM. It left a subtle remark in commit message that similar
> treatment should also be done while vCPU is in VMX non-root-mode.
>
> However, INIT signals should actually be latched in various vCPU states:
> (*) For both Intel and AMD, INIT signals should be latched while vCPU
> is in SMM.
> (*) For Intel, INIT should also be latched while vCPU is in VMX
> operation and later processed when vCPU leaves VMX operation by
> executing VMXOFF.
> (*) For AMD, INIT should also be latched while vCPU runs with GIF=0
> or in guest-mode with intercept defined on INIT signal.
>
> To fix this:
> 1) Add kvm_x86_ops->apic_init_signal_blocked() such that each CPU vendor
> can define the various CPU states in which INIT signals should be
> blocked and modify kvm_apic_accept_events() to use it.
> 2) Modify vmx_check_nested_events() to check for pending INIT signal
> while vCPU in guest-mode. If so, emualte vmexit on
> EXIT_REASON_INIT_SIGNAL. Note that nSVM should have similar behaviour
> but is currently left as a TODO comment to implement in the future
> because nSVM don't yet implement svm_check_nested_events().
>
> Note: Currently KVM nVMX implementation don't support VMX wait-for-SIPI
> activity state as specified in MSR_IA32_VMX_MISC bits 6:8 exposed to
> guest (See nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs()).
> If and when support for this activity state will be implemented,
> kvm_check_nested_events() would need to avoid emulating vmexit on
> INIT signal in case activity-state is wait-for-SIPI. In addition,
> kvm_apic_accept_events() would need to be modified to avoid discarding
> SIPI in case VMX activity-state is wait-for-SIPI but instead delay
> SIPI processing to vmx_check_nested_events() that would clear
> pending APIC events and emulate vmexit on SIPI.
>
> Reviewed-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Co-developed-by: Nikita Leshenko <nikita.leshchenko@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Nikita Leshenko <nikita.leshchenko@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Liran Alon <liran.alon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for doing this! I asked Marc to take a look at it earlier this
month, but he's been swamped.
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 11 +++++++----
> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 6 ++++++
> 5 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 74e88e5edd9c..158483538181 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1209,6 +1209,8 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
> uint16_t (*nested_get_evmcs_version)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>
> bool (*need_emulation_on_page_fault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +
> + bool (*apic_init_signal_blocked)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> };
>
> struct kvm_arch_async_pf {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index 685d17c11461..9620fe5ce8d1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -2702,11 +2702,14 @@ void kvm_apic_accept_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return;
>
> /*
> - * INITs are latched while in SMM. Because an SMM CPU cannot
> - * be in KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED state, just eat SIPIs
> - * and delay processing of INIT until the next RSM.
> + * INITs are latched while CPU is in specific states.
> + * Because a CPU cannot be in these states immediately
> + * after it have processed an INIT signal (and thus in
> + * KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED state), just eat SIPIs
> + * and delay processing of INIT until CPU leaves
> + * the state which latch INIT signal.
> */
> - if (is_smm(vcpu)) {
> + if (kvm_x86_ops->apic_init_signal_blocked(vcpu)) {
> WARN_ON_ONCE(vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED);
> if (test_bit(KVM_APIC_SIPI, &apic->pending_events))
> clear_bit(KVM_APIC_SIPI, &apic->pending_events);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index 6462c386015d..0e43acf7bea4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -7205,6 +7205,24 @@ static bool svm_need_emulation_on_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return false;
> }
>
> +static bool svm_apic_init_signal_blocked(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
> +
> + /*
> + * TODO: Last condition latch INIT signals on vCPU when
> + * vCPU is in guest-mode and vmcb12 defines intercept on INIT.
> + * To properly emulate INIT intercept, SVM should also implement
> + * kvm_x86_ops->check_nested_events() and process pending INIT
> + * signal to cause nested_svm_vmexit(). As SVM currently don't
> + * implement check_nested_events(), this work is delayed
> + * for future improvement.
> + */
> + return is_smm(vcpu) ||
> + !gif_set(svm) ||
> + (svm->vmcb->control.intercept & (1ULL << INTERCEPT_INIT));
> +}
> +
> static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops __ro_after_init = {
> .cpu_has_kvm_support = has_svm,
> .disabled_by_bios = is_disabled,
> @@ -7341,6 +7359,8 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops __ro_after_init = {
> .nested_get_evmcs_version = nested_get_evmcs_version,
>
> .need_emulation_on_page_fault = svm_need_emulation_on_page_fault,
> +
> + .apic_init_signal_blocked = svm_apic_init_signal_blocked,
> };
>
> static int __init svm_init(void)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> index ced9fba32598..d655fcd04c01 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> @@ -3401,6 +3401,15 @@ static int vmx_check_nested_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool external_intr)
> unsigned long exit_qual;
> bool block_nested_events =
> vmx->nested.nested_run_pending || kvm_event_needs_reinjection(vcpu);
> + struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
> +
> + if (lapic_in_kernel(vcpu) &&
> + test_bit(KVM_APIC_INIT, &apic->pending_events)) {
> + if (block_nested_events)
> + return -EBUSY;
> + nested_vmx_vmexit(vcpu, EXIT_REASON_INIT_SIGNAL, 0, 0);
> + return 0;
> + }
Suppose that L0 just finished emulating an L2 instruction with
EFLAGS.TF set. So, we've just queued up a #DB trap in
vcpu->arch.exception. On this emulated VM-exit from L2 to L1, the
guest pending debug exceptions field in the vmcs12 should get the
value of vcpu->arch.exception.payload, and the queued #DB should be
squashed.
> if (vcpu->arch.exception.pending &&
> nested_vmx_check_exception(vcpu, &exit_qual)) {
> @@ -4466,7 +4475,12 @@ static int handle_vmoff(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> if (!nested_vmx_check_permission(vcpu))
> return 1;
> +
> free_nested(vcpu);
> +
> + /* Process a latched INIT during time CPU was in VMX operation */
> + kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
> +
> return nested_vmx_succeed(vcpu);
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index b5b5b2e5dac5..5a1aa0640f2a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -7479,6 +7479,11 @@ static bool vmx_need_emulation_on_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return false;
> }
>
> +static bool vmx_apic_init_signal_blocked(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + return is_smm(vcpu) || to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.vmxon;
> +}
> +
> static __init int hardware_setup(void)
> {
> unsigned long host_bndcfgs;
> @@ -7803,6 +7808,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops __ro_after_init = {
> .get_vmcs12_pages = NULL,
> .nested_enable_evmcs = NULL,
> .need_emulation_on_page_fault = vmx_need_emulation_on_page_fault,
> + .apic_init_signal_blocked = vmx_apic_init_signal_blocked,
> };
>
> static void vmx_cleanup_l1d_flush(void)
> --
> 2.20.1
>
