Re: [KVM PATCH v9 1/2] KVM: make io_bus interface more robust

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 01:26:11PM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>   
>
>> I suppose its personal preference either way, so I guess unless Avi
>> objects lets just each have our own style in that regard.
>>     
>
> I think Avi already said we don't need to standardize everything.
> I hope at least some of the comments were helpful.
>
>   
Yes, it was very helpful and I really *do* appreciate the time you take
to review the code.  I think you will see that aside from the things we
agree are whitespace style, I addressed your feedback in v10.  The one
notable omission (and this was not intentional) was that I forgot to
document the return value like you requested.  If a v11 is needed after
review comments, I will update it then.  Otherwise, Ill just submit a
trivial doc patch after v10 is accepted.

Thanks again, Michael,
-Greg

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux