On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 03:56:09PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 07/07/2009 03:48 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>>> + >>>>> + __kvm_io_bus_unregister_dev(bus,&p->dev); >>>>> + iosignalfd_release(p); >>>>> >>>>> >>>> a single deassign removed multiple irqfds? Looks ugly. >>>> >>>> >>> Avi requested this general concept. >>> >> >> Really? Avi, could you explain? I would think each >> assign needs to be matched with 1 deassign. No? >> > > Doesn't it follow naturally? Yes. > How can a single deassign remove multiple > fds (unless all were registered with exactly the same arguments)? > Maybe we should instead detect that the duplicate iosignaldfds are > registered. > > Note that we do need to allow the same fd to be multiple times, but not > with exactly the same address/match etc. -- MST -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
