Re: [KVM PATCH v9 2/2] KVM: add iosignalfd support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/07/2009 03:51 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:

Seriously, why add artificial limitations?
IMO, addr=0,len=1 and addr=0,len=2 should not conflict.


They should not conflict, but a two byte write need not hit a one byte
registration.

Yes. That's exactly what I'm saying. I think it should be possible to
create 2 fds:

addr = 0
len = 1
addr = 0
len = 2
and at most one will ever trigger.

But current code will not let you create the second one.

I agree then.  Good catch.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux