On 20/05/19 11:55, Nadav Amit wrote:
> The test succeeds in failing entry. This is not an expected failure.
>
> Cc: Marc Orr <marcorr@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> x86/vmx.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/x86/vmx.c b/x86/vmx.c
> index f540e15..014bf50 100644
> --- a/x86/vmx.c
> +++ b/x86/vmx.c
> @@ -1833,8 +1833,7 @@ void enter_guest_with_bad_controls(void)
> "Called enter_guest() after guest returned.");
>
> ok = vmx_enter_guest(&failure);
> - report_xfail("vmlaunch fails, as expected",
> - true, ok);
> + report("vmlaunch fails, as expected", !ok);
> report("failure occurred early", failure.early);
> report("FLAGS set correctly",
> (failure.flags & VMX_ENTRY_FLAGS) == X86_EFLAGS_ZF);
>
Superseded by commit 74f7e9b ("vmx: introduce
enter_guest_with_invalid_guest_state", 2019-04-18); thanks anyway!
Paolo
