On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 10:21:37AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 05:44:03PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > From: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > encrypt_mprotect() is a new system call to support memory encryption. > > > > It takes the same parameters as legacy mprotect, plus an additional > > key serial number that is mapped to an encryption keyid. > > Shouldn't this patch be after the encrypt_mprotect() is added? COND_SYSCALL(encrypt_mprotect) defined in kernel/sys_ni.c, allowed it to build in this order, but the order is not logical. Thanks for pointing it out. I will reorder the two patches. Alison
