On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 01:50:45PM -0400, Daniel Jordan wrote: [snip] > diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h > index 0e8834ac32b7..72c1034d2ec7 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mm.h > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h > @@ -1564,6 +1564,25 @@ long get_user_pages_unlocked(unsigned long start, unsigned long nr_pages, > int get_user_pages_fast(unsigned long start, int nr_pages, > unsigned int gup_flags, struct page **pages); > > +int __account_locked_vm(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long pages, bool inc, > + struct task_struct *task, bool bypass_rlim); > + > +static inline int account_locked_vm(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long pages, > + bool inc) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + if (pages == 0 || !mm) > + return 0; > + > + down_write(&mm->mmap_sem); > + ret = __account_locked_vm(mm, pages, inc, current, > + capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)); > + up_write(&mm->mmap_sem); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > /* Container for pinned pfns / pages */ > struct frame_vector { > unsigned int nr_allocated; /* Number of frames we have space for */ > diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c > index e2e4f8c3fa12..bd3bdf16a084 100644 > --- a/mm/util.c > +++ b/mm/util.c > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ > #include <linux/err.h> > #include <linux/sched.h> > #include <linux/sched/mm.h> > +#include <linux/sched/signal.h> > #include <linux/sched/task_stack.h> > #include <linux/security.h> > #include <linux/swap.h> > @@ -346,6 +347,51 @@ int __weak get_user_pages_fast(unsigned long start, > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_user_pages_fast); > > +/** > + * __account_locked_vm - account locked pages to an mm's locked_vm > + * @mm: mm to account against, may be NULL This kernel doc is wrong. You dereference mm straight away... > + * @pages: number of pages to account > + * @inc: %true if @pages should be considered positive, %false if not > + * @task: task used to check RLIMIT_MEMLOCK > + * @bypass_rlim: %true if checking RLIMIT_MEMLOCK should be skipped > + * > + * Assumes @task and @mm are valid (i.e. at least one reference on each), and > + * that mmap_sem is held as writer. > + * > + * Return: > + * * 0 on success > + * * 0 if @mm is NULL (can happen for example if the task is exiting) > + * * -ENOMEM if RLIMIT_MEMLOCK would be exceeded. > + */ > +int __account_locked_vm(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long pages, bool inc, > + struct task_struct *task, bool bypass_rlim) > +{ > + unsigned long locked_vm, limit; > + int ret = 0; > + > + locked_vm = mm->locked_vm; here... Perhaps the comment was meant to document account_locked_vm()? Or should the parameter checks be moved here? Ira > + if (inc) { > + if (!bypass_rlim) { > + limit = task_rlimit(task, RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) >> PAGE_SHIFT; > + if (locked_vm + pages > limit) > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + } > + if (!ret) > + mm->locked_vm = locked_vm + pages; > + } else { > + WARN_ON_ONCE(pages > locked_vm); > + mm->locked_vm = locked_vm - pages; > + } > + > + pr_debug("%s: [%d] caller %ps %c%lu %lu/%lu%s\n", __func__, task->pid, > + (void *)_RET_IP_, (inc) ? '+' : '-', pages << PAGE_SHIFT, > + locked_vm << PAGE_SHIFT, task_rlimit(task, RLIMIT_MEMLOCK), > + ret ? " - exceeded" : ""); > + > + return ret; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__account_locked_vm); > > + > unsigned long vm_mmap_pgoff(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, > unsigned long len, unsigned long prot, > unsigned long flag, unsigned long pgoff) > > base-commit: a188339ca5a396acc588e5851ed7e19f66b0ebd9 > -- > 2.21.0 >