Re: [PATCH 6/7] KVM: lapic: Clean up the code for handling of a pre-expired hv_timer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 07:48:42PM +0300, Liran Alon wrote:
 Yes I understood that already.
> I don’t think it contradicts the fact that the checks I mentioned above
> should be moved out of start_hv_timer().

Ah, I misread your comment.  I think.  My head is spinning trying to
work through this code.

> > I think Paolo's suggestion of moving the logic up into restart_apic_timer()
> > is the way to go as it reduces the multiplexing down on start_hv_timer()'s
> > return value.
> > 
> 
> Yes I agree. I plan to do so.

And because I misread your comment, I already created this patch.  I'll
send it out shortly.



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux