On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 3:49 PM Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-03-25 at 14:42 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > Use dev_printk() when possible to make messages consistent with other > > device-related messages. > > trivial note: > > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_amdxgbe.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_amdxgbe.c > [] > > @@ -89,7 +89,8 @@ static int vfio_platform_amdxgbe_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev) > > } while ((pcs_value & MDIO_CTRL1_RESET) && --count); > > > > if (pcs_value & MDIO_CTRL1_RESET) > > - pr_warn("%s XGBE PHY reset timeout\n", __func__); > > + dev_warn(&vdev->device, "%s XGBE PHY reset timeout\n", > > + __func__); > > Many of these could use a colon after the %s used with __func__ > to make the output more consistent with other modules. Thanks, Joe. I added a colon to the two in vfio_platform_amdxgbe_reset(). Those were the only ones I saw, except for a couple "%s failed" messages in drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c, which I didn't change because (1) they can't use dev_err() so slightly out of scope for this patch, and (2) it arguably reads more naturally without the colon. In vfio_pci.c, I converted some pr_info() to dev_info() without adding a dev_fmt definition, so that removed the KBUILD_MODNAME prefix, which I didn't intend. I'll add "#define dev_fmt pr_fmt" to restore the prefix. Messages from drivers/vfio use a variety of prefixes (none, "VFIO: ", KBUILD_MODNAME, __func__). That could potentially be rationalized but I would want Alex's guidance first. Bjorn