Re: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 13:39 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 06/29/2009 01:32 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> >
> >> Do you really have a 100MB kernel?
> >>      
> >
> > Hmm. Maybe?
> >
> >     text	   data	    bss		    dec		    hex	filename
> > 5635486	5482828	84287488	95405802	5afc6ea	vmlinux
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 johannes johannes 86242879 2009-06-29 11:31 vmlinux
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 johannes johannes 83M 2009-06-29 11:31 vmlinux
> >
> > But that's with complete debug info.
> >    
> 
> debug info is not loaded IIUC.  But you have 84MB of BSS, that looks 
> very broken.  Maybe you have a zillion cpus configured, though that 
> should be dynamic now.

I had MAXSMP configured, which makes it 4096, but if I turn off MAXSMP
and make NR_CPUS 8, then I get
   text	   data	    bss	   	 dec		    hex	filename
5594521	2562924	12726272	20883717	13ea905	vmlinux

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux