On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 03:25:12PM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote: > Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:49:51AM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote: > > > >> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> > >>> For write transactions, pass the value written to in_range checks so > >>> that we can make each iosignalfd a separate device on kvm bus. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> --- > >>> > >>> Reposting with a subject now. Sorry. > >>> > >>> Avi, can you please merge this patch in kvm.git so that > >>> Gregory can use it for iosignalfd? Once bus has RCU > >>> we'll be able to remove in_range completely, but > >>> let's do it step by step. > >>> > >>> > >> I think this patch will just make more churn for me, not less. You have > >> now convinced me that your io_range-less approach is better. ;) > >> > >> Lets just fix the RCU thing and do it right. Patch is under development > >> as we speak. > >> > >> -Greg > >> > > > > So - let's go ahead with this one? > > > > > > Whatever you think is best and/or gets us to the end goal the fastest ;) > > -Greg > It's weekend here. If you can look at rcu meanwhile, go ahead. Or I will next week. -- MST -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
