Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:49:51AM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote: > >> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> >>> For write transactions, pass the value written to in_range checks so >>> that we can make each iosignalfd a separate device on kvm bus. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> >>> Reposting with a subject now. Sorry. >>> >>> Avi, can you please merge this patch in kvm.git so that >>> Gregory can use it for iosignalfd? Once bus has RCU >>> we'll be able to remove in_range completely, but >>> let's do it step by step. >>> >>> >> I think this patch will just make more churn for me, not less. You have >> now convinced me that your io_range-less approach is better. ;) >> >> Lets just fix the RCU thing and do it right. Patch is under development >> as we speak. >> >> -Greg >> > > So - let's go ahead with this one? > > Whatever you think is best and/or gets us to the end goal the fastest ;) -Greg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
