On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 12:13:35 +1100 Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/01/2019 01:47, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 12:08:03PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > >> --- > >> > >> drivers/vfio/pci/trace.h | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/trace.h b/drivers/vfio/pci/trace.h > >> index 228ccdb..4d13e51 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/trace.h > >> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/trace.h > >> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(vfio_pci_npu2_mmap, > >> #endif /* _TRACE_VFIO_PCI_H */ > >> > >> #undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH > >> -#define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH . > >> +#define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH ../../drivers/vfio/pci > > > > Note, the reason why I did not show this method in the samples/trace_events/ > > is that there's one "gotcha" that you need to be careful about. It may not be > > an issue here, but please be aware of it. > > > > The words in TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH can be updated by C preprocessor defines. For > > example, if for some reason you had: > > > > #define pci special_pci > > > > The above would turn into: > > > > ../../drivers/vfio/special_pci > > > > and it wont build, and you will be left scratching your head wondering why. Thanks for the info Steve, that'd definitely be a head scratcher, but it also seems really unlikely for this path. > Lovely :) imho it is +1 for > CFLAGS_vfio_pci_nvlink2.o += -I$(src) > and a comment. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=d1fc1176c055c9ec9c6ec4d113a284e0bad9d09a Obviously we can still refine further, but I don't see this new piece of information making a meaningful difference in the choice. Thanks, Alex