On 09.01.2019 15:52, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 01:07:16PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> On 09.01.2019 11:35, Wei Wang wrote: >>> On 01/08/2019 04:46 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>>> >>>> On 08.01.2019 06:35, Wei Wang wrote: >>>>> On 01/07/2019 09:49 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>>>>> On 07.01.2019 08:01, Wei Wang wrote: >>>>>>> virtio-ccw has deadlock issues with reading the config space inside the >>>>>>> interrupt context, so we tweak the virtballoon_changed implementation >>>>>>> by moving the config read operations into the related workqueue contexts. >>>>>>> The config_read_bitmap is used as a flag to the workqueue callbacks >>>>>>> about the related config fields that need to be read. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The cmd_id_received is also renamed to cmd_id_received_cache, and >>>>>>> the value should be obtained via virtio_balloon_cmd_id_received. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Reported-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> Together with >>>>>> virtio_pci: use queue idx instead of array idx to set up the vq >>>>>> virtio: don't allocate vqs when names[i] = NULL >>>>>> >>>>>> Tested-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> OK. I don't plan to send a new version of the above patches as no changes needed so far. >>>>> >>>>> Michael, if the above two patches look good to you, please help add the related tested-by >>>>> and reviewed-by tags. Thanks. >>>> Can we also make sure that >>>> >>>> virtio_pci: use queue idx instead of array idx to set up the vq >>>> virtio: don't allocate vqs when names[i] = NULL >>>> >>>> also land in stable? >>>> >>> >>> You could also send the request to stable after it gets merged to Linus' tree. >>> The stable review committee will decide whether to take it. >>> >>> Please see Option 2: >>> >>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html >>> >> >> Those patches are not upstream yet, Correct? >> >> Michael, >> >> can you add the stable tag before submitting? If not, can you give me a heads up when doing the >> pull request so that I can ping the stable folks. > > Can you reply to patches that you feel are needed on stable with just > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > in the message body? > > Then it's all automatically handled by ack attaching scripts. Done. But this only works if those patches are not already part of a tree. I guess they have to go via your tree, correct?
