Hi! On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 02:03:02AM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote: [...] > > V1: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/4/91 > > V2: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/10/135 > > V3: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/8/9/17 > > V4: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/8/22/17 > Can we please avoid referencing "lkml.org"? It's just an unreliable broken website. [1][2] Much more important though is that its URLs _hide_ the Message-Id field; running the threat of losing the e-mail reference forever at some point in the future. >From Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst: If the patch follows from a mailing list discussion, give a URL to the mailing list archive; use the https://lkml.kernel.org/ redirector with a ``Message-Id``, to ensure that the links cannot become stale. So the V1 link above should've been either: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1530716899.git.yi.z.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx or: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1530716899.git.yi.z.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and so on.. Thanks, [1] https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/01/14/linux_kernel_mailing_list_archives_will_return_soon [2] The threading interface is also broken and in a lot of cases does not show all messages in a thread -- Darwi http://darwish.chasingpointers.com
