Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2] s390x: Catch all exceptions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27.06.2018 16:31, Janosch Frank wrote:
> Right now we only catch the exceptions that we really expect to
> receive. Let's at least catch all of them and abort if any of the
> unexpected ones fell on our foot.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> I hope I understood you correctly, as assembly is not my strongest
> language skill.
> 
> ---
>  lib/s390x/interrupt.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  s390x/cstart64.S      | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/interrupt.c b/lib/s390x/interrupt.c
> index bc44e3a..848d5f2 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/interrupt.c
> +++ b/lib/s390x/interrupt.c
> @@ -104,3 +104,27 @@ void handle_pgm_int(void)
>  	pgm_int_expected = false;
>  	fixup_pgm_int();
>  }
> +
> +void handle_ext_int(void)
> +{
> +	report_abort("Unexpected external call interrupt: at %#lx",
> +		     lc->ext_old_psw.addr);
> +}
> +
> +void handle_mcck_int(void)
> +{
> +	report_abort("Unexpected machine check interrupt: at %#lx",
> +		     lc->mcck_old_psw.addr);
> +}
> +
> +void handle_io_int(void)
> +{
> +	report_abort("Unexpected io interrupt: at %#lx",
> +		     lc->io_old_psw.addr);
> +}
> +
> +void handle_svc_int(void)
> +{
> +	report_abort("Unexpected service call interrupt: at %#lx",
> +		     lc->svc_old_psw.addr);
> +}

We need prototypes for these in lib/s390x/asm/interrupt.h if I'm not wrong.

> diff --git a/s390x/cstart64.S b/s390x/cstart64.S
> index 9a26ed3..3ead2d2 100644
> --- a/s390x/cstart64.S
> +++ b/s390x/cstart64.S
> @@ -26,6 +26,18 @@ init_psw_cont:
>  	/* setup pgm interrupt handler */
>  	larl	%r1, pgm_int_psw
>  	mvc	GEN_LC_PGM_NEW_PSW(16), 0(%r1)
> +	/* setup ext interrupt handler */
> +	larl	%r1, ext_int_psw
> +	mvc	GEN_LC_EXT_NEW_PSW(16), 0(%r1)
> +	/* setup mcck interrupt handler */
> +	larl	%r1, mcck_int_psw
> +	mvc	GEN_LC_MCCK_NEW_PSW(16), 0(%r1)
> +	/* setup io interrupt handler */
> +	larl	%r1, ext_int_psw
> +	mvc	GEN_LC_IO_NEW_PSW(16), 0(%r1)
> +	/* setup svc interrupt handler */
> +	larl	%r1, mcck_int_psw
> +	mvc	GEN_LC_SVC_NEW_PSW(16), 0(%r1)
>  	/* setup cr0, enabling e.g. AFP-register control */
>  	larl	%r1, initital_cr0
>  	lctlg	%c0, %c0, 0(%r1)
> @@ -42,7 +54,7 @@ init_psw_cont:
>  	/* call exit() */
>  	j exit
>  
> -pgm_int:
> +.macro SAVE_REGS

I remember that macros are also intended (looking at e.g.
arch/s390/kernel/entry.S)

>  	/* save grs 0-15 */
>  	stmg	%r0, %r15, GEN_LC_SW_INT_GRS
>  	/* save fprs 0-15 + fpc */
> @@ -64,8 +76,9 @@ pgm_int:
>  	std	%f14, 112(%r1)
>  	std	%f15, 120(%r1)
>  	stfpc	GEN_LC_SW_INT_FPC
> -	/* call our c handler */
> -	brasl	%r14, handle_pgm_int
> +.endm
> +
> +.macro RESTORE_REGS
>  	/* restore fprs 0-15 + fpc */
>  	larl	%r1, GEN_LC_SW_INT_FPRS
>  	ld	%f0, 0(%r1)
> @@ -87,13 +100,52 @@ pgm_int:
>  	lfpc	GEN_LC_SW_INT_FPC
>  	/* restore grs 0-15 */
>  	lmg	%r0, %r15, GEN_LC_SW_INT_GRS
> +.endm
> +
> +.section .text
> +pgm_int:
> +	SAVE_REGS
> +	brasl	%r14, handle_pgm_int
> +	RESTORE_REGS
>  	lpswe	GEN_LC_PGM_OLD_PSW
>  
> +ext_int:
> +	SAVE_REGS
> +	brasl	%r14, handle_ext_int
> +	RESTORE_REGS
> +	lpswe	GEN_LC_EXT_OLD_PSW
> +
> +mcck_int:
> +	SAVE_REGS
> +	brasl	%r14, handle_mcck_int
> +	RESTORE_REGS
> +	lpswe	GEN_LC_MCCK_OLD_PSW
> +
> +io_int:
> +	SAVE_REGS
> +	brasl	%r14, handle_io_int
> +	RESTORE_REGS
> +	lpswe	GEN_LC_IO_OLD_PSW
> +
> +svc_int:
> +	SAVE_REGS
> +	brasl	%r14, handle_svc_int
> +	RESTORE_REGS
> +	lpswe	GEN_LC_SVC_OLD_PSW
> +
>  	.align	8
>  initital_psw:
>  	.quad	0x0000000180000000, init_psw_cont
>  pgm_int_psw:
>  	.quad	0x0000000180000000, pgm_int
> +ext_int_psw:
> +	.quad	0x0000000180000000, ext_int
> +mcck_int_psw:
> +	.quad	0x0000000180000000, mcck_int
> +io_int_psw:
> +	.quad	0x0000000180000000, io_int
> +svc_int_psw:
> +	.quad	0x0000000180000000, svc_int
>  initital_cr0:
>  	/* enable AFP-register control, so FP regs (+BFP instr) can be used */
>  	.quad	0x0000000000040000
> 

Apart from that, looks good to me.

-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux