On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 9:01 AM, Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> For consistency, can we also change the various cpu_has_vmx_* >> functions that test for physical cpu capabilities to >> cpu_supports_vmx_*? > > Seems reasonable, but I thought there weren't any -- can you name an > example, thanks. cpu_has_vmx_msr_bitmap cpu_has_vmx_tpr_shadow cpu_has_vmx_virtualize_apic_accesses cpu_has_vmx_virtualize_x2apic_mode cpu_has_vmx_apic_register_virt cpu_has_vmx_virtual_intr_delivery cpu_has_vmx_preemption_timer cpu_has_vmx_posted_intr cpu_has_vmx_apicv cpu_has_vmx_flexpriority cpu_has_vmx_ept_execute_only cpu_has_vmx_ept_2m_page cpu_has_vmx_ept_1g_page cpu_has_vmx_ept_4levels cpu_has_vmx_ept_mt_wb cpu_has_vmx_ept_5levels cpu_has_vmx_ept_ad_bits cpu_has_vmx_invept_context cpu_has_vmx_invept_global cpu_has_vmx_invvpid_individual_addr cpu_has_vmx_invvpid_single cpu_has_vmx_invvpid_global cpu_has_vmx_invvpid cpu_has_vmx_ept cpu_has_vmx_unrestricted_guest cpu_has_vmx_ple cpu_has_vmx_basic_inout cpu_has_vmx_vpid cpu_has_vmx_rdtscp cpu_has_vmx_invpcid cpu_has_vmx_wbinvd_exit cpu_has_vmx_shadow_vmcs cpu_has_vmx_pml cpu_has_vmx_tsc_scaling cpu_has_vmx_vmfunc
