Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] KVM: x86: Add support for VMware backdoor Pseudo-PMCs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 16/03/2018 17:56, Liran Alon wrote:
>> 1) who wrote the first six patches, you (Liran) or Krish Sadhukhan?
> I wrote them.
> Because of internal legal agreements on how to submit patches on Oracle,
> I need someone from another internal organization in Oracle to review the
> patch and add it's signoff to the patch (In addition to mine).
> You can see that all of my previous patches to KVM which were already
> merged looks similar.
> 
>> 2) why do the last 4 patches have Konrad's SoB?
> Same reason. They both reviewed it. You can take only one of them.

The signoff has a specific meaning, that is one of the following:

- the patch is your work and you have the right to submit it to Linux
(under an appropriate license),

- the patch is based on work that you know you have the right to submit
to Linux,

- the patch was provided to you by someone else who had signed-off the
work before.

(The short legalese is at https://developercertificate.org/).  So if
people "sign off" internally for upstream submission you don't need to
put their Signed-off-by line.

>> 3) why does the last patch lack your SoB, and who wrote it, you or
>> Arbel?
> Arbel wrote the last patch.
> That's why I didn't put my SoB on it.
> It does contain the SoB of Konrad which reviewed it because of the legal agreement.

If you send it, you do need to add your sign off, just like I add mine
before sending it to Linus.  Konrad's review again doesn't matter.

Paolo



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux