Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] KVM: x86: Add support for VMware backdoor Pseudo-PMCs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 16/03/2018 17:30, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> 2018-03-16 08:59-0700, Liran Alon:
>> ----- rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> We fall through and return true for 0x33 with opcode_len == 1,
>>> plase add a break.
>>
>> Oops. Nice catch. Will add missing break instruction of course.
>> Do you want to add it on apply or should I re-submit the series with this fix?
> 
> I think Paolo will add it.  I didn't notice any other problems and
> resubmitting the series would be an overkill.
> 
> With that, consider the series
> 
> Reviewed-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I'm sad that the backdoor ports behave like this, but you handled it
> nicely.
> 

... just one thing, the SoB chain is messed up.  I can fix it, but I
need the answers to these questions:

1) who wrote the first six patches, you (Liran) or Krish Sadhukhan?

2) why do the last 4 patches have Konrad's SoB?

3) why does the last patch lack your SoB, and who wrote it, you or Arbel?

Thanks!

Paolo



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux