On 13.02.2018 15:48, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 05/02/2018 13:59, Stefan Raspl wrote: >> From: Stefan Raspl <stefan.raspl@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Helps quite a bit reading the code when it's obvious when a method is >> intended for internal use only. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Raspl <raspl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Since no subclassing is involved, should these be _single_underscore > methods rather than __double_underscore? Yup - one could argue that this way it's more future proof. But the reality is that I thought I had read that this is the way to go. Probably listened to the wrong voices in my head... Will fix. Ciao, Stefan
