On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:17:10AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 19.01.2018 11:12, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 09:47:01PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >> Two minor things
> >>
> >>>
> >>> +struct kvm_s390_gisa {
> >>> + u32 next_alert;
> >>> + u8 ipm;
> >>> + u8 reserved01;
> >>> + u8:6;
> >>
> >> Mind giving this also a reserved name
> >
> > And then all reserved fields have to be renamed as soon as one bit gets
> > used? Please don't...
>
> Only if one keeps the order of the reserved field numbers ...
And that's what people usually do. Therefore having unnamed bitfields is
nice, since you don't have to care.
