On 13 December 2017 at 03:59, gengdongjiu <gengdongjiu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On 2017/12/11 21:32, Igor Mammedov wrote: >> On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 19:31:14 +0800 >> gengdongjiu <gengdongjiu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Hi maintainer, >>> >>> This patch set seems pending about one month, could you help review for them? Thanks. >> I'm going to look at ACPI side of it this week. > > Hi Peter/shannon, > Igor will review the ACPI part code, > could you review below five patches? which does not depend on OS kernel patch and have received the agreement with others about the solution. > Thanks very much. > > [v13,08/12] target-arm: kvm64: inject synchronous External Abort > [v13,09/12] Move related hwpoison page function to accel/kvm/ folder > [v13,10/12] ARM: ACPI: Add _E04 for hardware error device > [v13,11/12] hw/arm/virt: Add RAS platform version for migration > [v13,12/12] target-arm: kvm64: handle SIGBUS signal from kernel or KVM Hi; unfortunately I only have one more working day this year, which isn't really enough to get up to speed sufficiently with RAS to review this patchset, so the earliest I'm likely to get to it is the week beginning 9th Jan. Hopefully somebody who understands RAS better than me will be able to review it before then. thanks -- PMM
