On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 7:14 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 22/10/2017 09:44, Christoffer Dall wrote: >> However, I think it's much clearer if I >> rewrite these to use get_user() and put_user(). v2 incoming. > > I'd actually prefer if you all do a trivial conversion to > kvm_init_usercopy to begin with. In fact, we could just change the > default from "0, 0" to "0, sizeof (kvm_arch_vcpu)" in kvm_init. Any > other change can be applied after the patches are merged to Linus's > tree, especially with KVM Forum and the merge window both coming soon. > > I'll send a v2 myself later this week. Okay, which patches would you like me to carry in the usercopy whitelisting tree for the coming merge window? -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security
