>> Hmm.... probably have too look into the details of the malloc discussion... > > It's really less work than it sounds. I'm not wed to GTest, but I think > the ability to define test cases programmatically is useful (vmexit.c > for example has a case where the testcase list is actually in QEMU!) and > it pretty much requires malloc. Btw, by "has a case where the testcase list is actually in QEMU" you mean simply selecting the list of tests to run via -apend? This is already supported in this current RFC, and the way Thomas implemented it doesn't require malloc - see "run_it". (it's not 100% clean but for our purpose just ok). > > Paolo > -- Thanks, David
