Re: [PATCH 0/6] Add rudimentary Hyper-V guest support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alexander Graf wrote:
In order to find out why things were slow with nested SVM I hacked intercept reporting into debugfs in my local tree and found pretty interesting results (using NPT):


[...]

So apparently the most intercepts come from the SVM helper calls (clgi, stgi, vmload, vmsave). I guess I need to get back to the "emulate when GIF=0" approach to get things fast.

There's only a limited potential here (a factor of three, reducing 6 exits to 2, less the emulation overhead). There's a lot more to be gained from nested npt, since you'll avoid most of the original exits in the first place.

--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux