Re: KVM is type 1 hypervisor, but...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2017-05-28 21:06, Sylvain Leroux wrote:
> Thank you Christoph for all those great comments.
> 
> You're very convincing in explaining your point. But how could you
> explain there is such abundant literacy taking the type 1/type 2
> dichotomy as a fundamental distinction between hypervisors? On the other
> hand, I found very difficult to find papers debunking that myth. But
> maybe you or the KVM team did write such an article and I missed it?
> 

It's more productive to develop hypervisors than to write about them. ;)

People like classifications. They suggest the world is simple and can be
abstracted. You need to look closer to understand that this is generally
not that simple. But that's a boring, often disliked story to tell...

Jan



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux