On 05/10/2017 05:32 AM, guangrong.xiao@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@xxxxxxxxxxx> Any tick policy specified on other platforms rather on TARGET_I386 will fall back to LOST_TICK_POLICY_DISCARD silently, this patch makes sure only TARGET_I386 can enable LOST_TICK_POLICY_SLEW After that, we can enable LOST_TICK_POLICY_SLEW in the common code which need not use '#ifdef TARGET_I386' to make these code be x86 specific anymore Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@xxxxxxxxx>
--- hw/timer/mc146818rtc.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/timer/mc146818rtc.c b/hw/timer/mc146818rtc.c index dac6744..9810bd5 100644 --- a/hw/timer/mc146818rtc.c +++ b/hw/timer/mc146818rtc.c @@ -980,19 +980,19 @@ static void rtc_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) rtc_set_date_from_host(isadev); -#ifdef TARGET_I386 switch (s->lost_tick_policy) { +#ifdef TARGET_I386 case LOST_TICK_POLICY_SLEW: s->coalesced_timer = timer_new_ns(rtc_clock, rtc_coalesced_timer, s); break; +#endif case LOST_TICK_POLICY_DISCARD: break; default: error_setg(errp, "Invalid lost tick policy."); return; } -#endif s->periodic_timer = timer_new_ns(rtc_clock, rtc_periodic_timer, s); s->update_timer = timer_new_ns(rtc_clock, rtc_update_timer, s);