Am 27.02.2017 um 11:02 schrieb David Hildenbrand: > Am 24.02.2017 um 20:49 schrieb Radim Krčmář: >> The leading underscores denote that the call is just a bitop wrapper. > > Actually, the leading underscore is misleading > > If we want to match the semantics of set/test/clear_bit, using a leading > underscore might feel like using the non-atomic variants like > __clear_bit and friends. > > I'd prefer to simply drop the underscore. > Okay, this is not really possible for __kvm_request_set(). Hm..... -- Thanks, David
