Am 24.02.2017 um 20:49 schrieb Radim Krčmář: > The leading underscores denote that the call is just a bitop wrapper. Actually, the leading underscore is misleading If we want to match the semantics of set/test/clear_bit, using a leading underscore might feel like using the non-atomic variants like __clear_bit and friends. I'd prefer to simply drop the underscore. -- Thanks, David