Re: Paravirtualisation or not?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 10:40:00PM +0800, howard chen wrote:
> Yes, paravirtualization is good. If running KVM, use paravirtualized network
> and disk/block drivers for better performance.

So does it mean generally Xen is more optimized than KVM for speed?

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux