On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 03:47:13PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote: > We need to call this whenever we want to do DMA with a device. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > lib/pci.c | 7 +++++++ > lib/pci.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/lib/pci.c b/lib/pci.c > index 95a6581..1495f61 100644 > --- a/lib/pci.c > +++ b/lib/pci.c > @@ -7,6 +7,13 @@ > #include "pci.h" > #include "asm/pci.h" > > +void pci_set_master(struct pci_dev *dev, int master) Why take pci_dev instead of just the devid/bdf here? What is the 'master' argument (which is unused and at least needs an __unused to compile) here for? > +{ > + uint32_t val = pci_config_readw(dev->pci_bdf, PCI_COMMAND); > + val |= PCI_COMMAND_MASTER; > + pci_config_writew(dev->pci_bdf, PCI_COMMAND, val); Hmm... Alex uses pci_config_writel for the PCI_COMMAND register. I see writew is correct. Need to go back his series and make another comment... > +} > + > bool pci_dev_exists(pcidevaddr_t dev) > { > return (pci_config_readw(dev, PCI_VENDOR_ID) != 0xffff && > diff --git a/lib/pci.h b/lib/pci.h > index e48045c..46657f4 100644 > --- a/lib/pci.h > +++ b/lib/pci.h > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ struct pci_dev { > > void pci_dev_init(struct pci_dev *dev, pcidevaddr_t bdf); > void pci_scan_bars(struct pci_dev *dev); > +void pci_set_master(struct pci_dev *dev, int master); > > extern bool pci_probe(void); > extern void pci_print(void); > -- > 2.7.4 > drew -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html