On Friday 24 April 2009, Oliver Rath wrote: > Hi, > > Im looking for an abillity seeing vt-capability of Intel-processors by > there name :-/ > > I.e. T7200 has vt, T3400 has not. Exists a rule for the naming scheme > seeing vt-capability? Alternatively, exists a matrix anywhere in the net > for this? > > Im tired searching for vt-capability for every new OEM-intel-processor. > On intel-site _did_ exist a pdf-table (not all processors, but most of > T-series), but it seems to be removed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Core_2_microprocessors is quite good here. As a rule of thumb, anything higher than 6000 will have VT, anything below 6000 will not. Interesting exceptions are Doesn't have VT: E7300, Q8200, Q8400, E8190 Does have VT: T5600, U2xxx, SU3xxx, Celeron 900 (?) May have VT[1]: T5500, Q8300, E7400, E7500, E5300, E5400 Interestingly, when you look at the price list, you will see that *all* processors that are not being obviously phased out (i.e. have the same or higher price as a superior model) and carry a Pentium or Core 2 name come with VT enabled. I think it's very unlikely that they will come out with anything new that does not run KVM. Arnd <>< [1] http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Auch-billigere-Intel-Prozessoren-bald-mit-Virtualisierungsbefehlen--/meldung/136306 [2] http://www.intc.com/priceList.cfm -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
