Re: OT: Intel-Matrix for VT-capability?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Oliver Rath <rath68 <at> web.de> writes:
> 
> Im looking for an abillity seeing vt-capability of Intel-processors by
> there name :-/
>
> I.e. T7200 has vt, T3400 has not. Exists a rule for the naming scheme
> seeing vt-capability? Alternatively, exists a matrix anywhere in the net
> for this?

Browse http://processorfinder.intel.com - Intel VT is reflected by the 
presence of "Intel® Virtualization Technology" in the supported feature list.

T7200: http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SL9SL
T3400: http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SLB3P

> Im tired searching for vt-capability for every new OEM-intel-processor.
> On intel-site _did_ exist a pdf-table (not all processors, but most of
> T-series), but it seems to be removed.

You are probably talking about the price list PDF file at 
http://www.intc.com/priceList.cfm

I too am very annoyed that so many entry-level and medium-level Intel 
processors don't seem to support Intel VT. For example the less expensive one 
supporting VT is the Core 2 Duo E8400 at $163. Whereas in the case of AMD even 
their cheap $40 processors support AMD-V.

-marc

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux