Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> Paolo, would you prefer this, or the other approach you already ack'd ? >> > >> > I think I prefer the other, because vcpu_debug is not ratelimited. >> > If the guest can trigger a printk it should always be ratelimited. >> >> Agree with rate limiting, but making this the default for everything doesn't >> sound right IMO, especially for ignore_msrs=1. vcpu_unimpl is already rate >> limited. > > The problem is that your patch removes rate limiting whenever it now > uses vcpu_debug. I was suggesting Dave to do something like what I posted but with a new vcpu_debug_ratelimited. > Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
