> >> Paolo, would you prefer this, or the other approach you already ack'd ? > > > > I think I prefer the other, because vcpu_debug is not ratelimited. > > If the guest can trigger a printk it should always be ratelimited. > > Agree with rate limiting, but making this the default for everything doesn't > sound right IMO, especially for ignore_msrs=1. vcpu_unimpl is already rate > limited. The problem is that your patch removes rate limiting whenever it now uses vcpu_debug. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
