Re: patch for virtual machine oriented scheduling(1)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Andrew Theurer
<habanero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Just wondering, was it not possible to introduce a new scheduling class in
> the current scheduler?  My impression was that the current scheduler was
> fairly modular and should allow this.
>
> -Andrew
The reasons are:
1. I am afraid that modifications to the Linux scheduler might cause
unexpected effects, because it is a global one.
2. an extra execution control solution like mine is the simplest one
to implement.
3. As far as I can see, the benefit of replacing Linux scheduler only
lies that as soon as a scheduling decision is made, it can be put into
practice immediately. I think this benefit is neglectable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux