Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 04/12] pci: Rework pci_bar_addr()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 04:12:03PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > +phys_addr_t pci_bar_size(pcidevaddr_t dev, int bar_num)
> >  {
> >  	uint32_t bar = pci_config_readl(dev, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0 + bar_num * 4);
> > +	phys_addr_t size = (int32_t)pci_bar_size32(dev, bar_num);
> > +	phys_addr_t mask = (int32_t)pci_bar_mask(bar);
> >  
> > -	if (bar & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_IO)
> > -		return bar & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_IO_MASK;
> > -	else
> > -		return bar & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK;
> > +	if (pci_bar_is64(dev, bar_num)) {
> > +		uint32_t size_high = pci_bar_size32(dev, bar_num + 1);
> > +		size = ((phys_addr_t)size_high << 32) | (uint32_t)size;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return (~(size & mask)) + 1;
> 
> All this casting of size and mask is pointless. Please rework it
> similar to what I did above.

This is the most compact and straight variant I was able to come up with:

	uint32_t bar = pci_bar_get(dev, bar_num);
	phys_addr_t size = (int32_t)pci_bar_size32(dev, bar_num);
	phys_addr_t mask = (int32_t)pci_bar_mask(bar);

	if (pci_bar_is64(dev, bar_num))
		size |= (phys_addr_t)pci_bar_size32(dev, bar_num + 1) << 32;

	return (~(size & mask)) + 1;

The casting is needed to avoid putting explicitly all 1s into higher
bits of size and/or mask. Otherwise (~(size & mask)) + 1 expression would
not bring correct results. I really struggle to make something better
readable.

> Thanks,
> drew 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux