2016-05-24 10:19 GMT+08:00 Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@xxxxxxxxx>: > 2016-05-24 2:01 GMT+08:00 David Matlack <dmatlack@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> I'm ok with this patch, but I'd like to better understand the target >> workloads. What type of workloads do you expect to benefit from this? > > dynticks guests I think is one of workloads which can get benefit, > there are lots of upcoming fire timers captured by my feature. Even > during TCP testing. And also the workload of Yang's. Do you think I should add an module parameter to enable/disable it during module insmod or current patch is fine? Regards, Wanpeng Li -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
